Published since 1923
DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019
Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) на платформе Web of Science


  • BUILDING STRUCTURES, BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
  • Integrated Approach to Determining Sizes of Light Openings in Buildings Taking into Account Safety Requirements
  • UDC 628.92 DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2019.05.20-25
    Nguyen Thi Khanh PHUONG (Vietnam), e-mail: phuongntk@nuce.edu.vn
    Àleksei K. SOLOVYEV, e-mail: agpz@mgsu.ru
    Ashot G. TAMRAZYAN, e-mail: gbk@mgsu.ru
    Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University), Yaroslavskoe shosse, 26, Moscow 129337, Russian Federation
    Abstract. Enclosing structures with openings play an important role in regulating the microclimate environment in the premises. At the same time, calculations on requirements for thermal comfort, natural lighting and also safety in construction should be solved together in the design process. An integrated approach to the design of openings intersects with different factors from different fields of the studies. When considering the physics of the environment in buildings, to ensure human comfort, lighting and cooling, heating in rooms a high amount of energy is required. Within the framework of this article, the influence of the window to floor ratio in calculations of natural lighting is also estimated in terms of increasing fire resistance and reducing the impact of internal explosive loads. As a result, the value of window to floor ratio of 15-22 % was obtained for a normalized artificial illumination of 300-500 lux. The integrated approach to the design of openings in enclosing structures makes it possible to create a microclimate in the premises, providing comfortable conditions for visual works and safety.
    Key words: light opening, natural lighting factor, energy saving, enclosing structure, fire safety, explosion safety.
  • REFERENCES
    1. The U.S. Green Building Council. LEED: Leadership in energy and environmental design [Ñîâåò ïî ýêîëîãè÷åñêîìó ñòðîèòåëüñòâó ÑØÀ. LEED: ëèäåðñòâî â ýíåðãåòèêå è äèçàéíå îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäû]. Available at: http://www.breeam.org (accessed 1.02.2019).
    2. Building Research Establishment. BREEAM-The BRE. Environmental assessment method [Íàó÷íî-èññëåäîâàòåëüñêèé èíñòèòóò. BREEAM-BRE Ìåòîä ýêîëîãè÷åñêîé îöåíêè]. Available at: http://www.breeam.org (accessed 1.02.2019).
    3. Mardaljevic J., Heschong L., Lee E. S. Daylight metrics and energy savings [Õàðàêòåðèñòèêè åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ è ýíåðãîñáåðåæåíèå]. Lighting Research and Technology, 2009, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 261-283.
    4. Fernandez E., Moreno-Rangel P. M., Fernandez D., Manue E. Simulacion dinamica de luz natural: Nuevas tecnicas e indicadores para la reduccion del consumo energetico en iluminacion [Äèíàìè÷åñêîå ìîäåëèðîâàíèå åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ: íîâûå ìåòîäû è èíäèêàòîðû äëÿ ñíèæåíèÿ ýíåðãîïîòðåáëåíèÿ ïðè îñâåùåíèè]. Congreso internacional de costruccion sostenible y soluciones ecoeficientes. Sevilla, 2015. Pp. 726-752.
    5. Lim Y. W., Ahmad M. H., Ossena D. R. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in malaysian contemporary high-rise open plan office [Âíóòðåííåå çàòåíåíèå äëÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî òðîïè÷åñêîãî åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ â ñîâðåìåííûõ âûñîòíûõ îôèñàõ Ìàëàéçèè]. Indoor Built Environment, 2013, vol. 20, pp. 932-951.
    6. Phuong N. T. Kh., Solov'yov A. K. Determination of the light efficiency of solar radiation for Vietnam. Ekonomika stroitel'stva i prirodopol'zovaniya, 2018, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 137-143. (In Russian).
    7. Solov'yov A. K., Phuong N. T. Kh. Method of calculating the light climate for the light efficiency of solar radiation: an example of a comparative analysis of the light climate of Hanoi and Moscow. Svetotekhnika, 2018, vol. 5, pp. 21-24. (In Russian).
    8. Monoz C., Esquivias P., Rangel D., Acosta I., Navarro J. Climate-based daylighting analysis for the effects of location, orientation and obstruction [Êëèìàòè÷åñêèé àíàëèç åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ äëÿ îïðåäåëåíèÿ ìåñòîïîëîæåíèÿ, îðèåíòàöèè è çàñòðîéêè]. Lighting Research and Technology, 2014, vol. 46, pp. 268-280.
    9. Mardaljevic J., Christoffersen J. A roadmap for upgrading national/EU standards for daylight in buildings [Äîðîæíàÿ êàðòà äëÿ îáíîâëåíèÿ íàöèîíàëüíûõ / åâðîïåéñêèõ ñòàíäàðòîâ åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ â çäàíèÿõ]. CIE Centenary Conference "Towards a New Century of Light", 2013. 183 p.
    10. Wymelenberg K. V. D., Mahic A. Annual daylighting performance metrics, explained [Åæåãîäíûå ïîêàçàòåëè èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ, îáúÿñíåíèå]. Architecture lighting, technology, April 12, 2016. 5 p.
    11. Aries M. B, Veich J. A., Newsham G. R. Windows, view and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort [Îêíà, âèä íàðóæó è õàðàêòåðèñòèêè îôèñà îïðåäåëÿþò ôèçè÷åñêèé è ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèé äèñêîìôîðò]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, pp. 533-541.
    12. Solov'yov A. K. Fizika sredy [Physics of the environment]. Moscow, ASV Pupl., 2008. 334 p. (In Russian).
    13. Perez Y. V., Capeluto I. G. Climatic considerations in school building design in the hot-humid climate for reducing energy consumption [Êëèìàòè÷åñêèå ñîîáðàæåíèÿ ïðè ïðîåêòèðîâàíèè øêîëüíûõ çäàíèé â óñëîâèÿõ æàðêîãî è âëàæíîãî êëèìàòà äëÿ ñíèæåíèÿ ýíåðãîïîòðåáëåíèÿ]. Applied Energy, 2009, vol. 86, iss. 3, pp. 340-348.
    14. Mirrahimi S., Lukman N., Ibrahim N., Surat M. Estimateion daylight to find simple formulate based on the ratio of window area to floor area rule of thumb for classroom in Malaysia [Îöåíêà åñòåñòâåííîãî îñâåùåíèÿ äëÿ ïðèáëèçèòåëüíîãî îïðåäåëåíèÿ ñ ïîìîùüþ ïðîñòîé ôîðìóëû, îñíîâàííîé íà îòíîøåíèè ïëîùàäè îêíà ê ïëîùàäè ïîëà äëÿ øêîëüíûõ êëàññîâ â Ìàëàéçèè]. Engineering and Technology, Malaysia, 2013, no. 5, pp. 931-935.
    15. Róáöîâ V.V. Dinamika opasnykh faktorov pozhara i raschot kriticheskoy prodolzhitel'nosti pozhara v proizvodstvennykh pomeshcheniyakh [Dynamics of dangerous fire factors and calculation of the critical duration of fire in industrial premises]. Moscow, 1998. 81 p. Available at: http://tekhnosfera.com/dinamika-opasnyh-faktorov-pozhara-i-raschet-kriticheskoy-prodolzhitelnosti-pozhara-v-proizvodstvennyh-pomescheniyah. (In Russian).
    16. Tamrazyan A. G. et al. Snizheniye riskov v stroitel'stve pri chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh prirodnogo i tekhnogennogo kharaktera [Risk reduction in construction in natural and man-made emergencies]. Moscow, ASV Publ., 2012. 304 p. (In Russian).
    17. Tamrazyan A. G. Risk assessment and reliability of supporting structures and key elements - a necessary condition for the safety of buildings and structures. Vestnik TSNIISK im. V. A. Kucherenko "Issledovaniya po teorii sooruzhenij", 2009, no. 1, pp. 160-171. (In Russian).
    18. Tamrazyan A. G. Reduce the impact of dynamic strength of concrete under fire conditions on bearing capacity of reinforced concrete columns [Óìåíüøåíèå âëèÿíèÿ äèíàìè÷åñêîé ïðî÷íîñòè áåòîíà â óñëîâèÿõ ïîæàðà íà íåñóùóþ ñïîñîáíîñòü æåëåçîáåòîííûõ êîëîíí]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, vol. 475-476, pp. 1563-1566.
  • For citation: Phuong N. T. Kh., Solovyev A. K., Tamrazyan A. G. Integrated Approach to Determining Sizes of Light Openings in Buildings Taking into Account Safety Requirements. Promyshlennoye i grazhdanskoye stroitel'stvo [Industrial and Civil Construction], 2019, no. 5, pp. 20-25. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2019.05.20-25.

BACK